Advances in physics could seem summary at first however tech usually follows

Sakkmesterke/Alamy
WHY are elementary physicists so eager to undermine the very theories that are the bedrock of their success? It's a affordable query to ask confronted with the thrill effervescent round anomalies that appear to be firming up at CERN’s LHCb experiment.
At stake is a particle that may – the “would possibly” bears emphasising – break open the usual mannequin of particle physics, the framework that efficiently explains three of the 4 forces of nature.
The reply lies in what the usual mannequin doesn’t clarify: the fourth power, gravity; the darkish matter and darkish power that appear to dominate the …


Post a Comment