Disclosure: The entire corporations talked about right here besides Apple are purchasers of the writer.
One of many individuals I love within the tech world is Stella Low, who I initially met at Dell Applied sciences. She moved from Dell to Cisco to Apple, after which shortly jumped to HP. Dell, Cisco ,and HP all prioritize worker and companion job satisfaction, whereas Apple is much extra targeted on margins and reducing prices.
Which method is best?
Apple’s efficiency and market valuation present the monetary advantages of its ways, however points with corporations like Qualcomm, and its fixed efforts to take away staff’ capability to go away can create critical issues with hiring and retention as soon as these strategies are found and turn into broadly identified.
Apple seems to be managing staff as if they're commodities — not an unusual method, however one that always has outcomes like unionization and excessive worker churn. Offsetting that churn are insurance policies that prohibit worker motion, that are additionally not unusual. Dell, Cisco, and HP deal with staff extra like individuals, some would possibly argue extra like an excellent household.
The idea is that the Dell, Cisco, and HP method is much less prone to end in worker unions, unsustainable worker churn, or behavioral points tied to worker abuse. That’s concept, aat least, although the underlying perceptions could possibly be pushed extra by the occasions than the method.
What’s occurring proper now marks one of many uncommon events whenever you see two conflicting worker administration techniques in the identical trade being pursued on the identical time at scale.
The remote-work concept
Arguably, the corporate that helps distant staff probably the most aggressively is Dell. Ordered from the top-down, Dell has not solely allowed any worker to work remotely, however it is usually probably the most aggressive with packages that attempt to assist staff do a greater job with work/life stability, whereas inserting a excessive precedence on creating relationships inside the corporate.
Apple, in distinction, has demanded that staff return to the workplace — and seems unwilling (or unable) to efficiently handle those that select to work at home. Dell places staff’ desires and wishes first, whereas Apple sees command-and-control as the upper precedence. As well as, Apple seems to place workplace occupancy above worker satisfaction; Dell seems to be rethinking each the significance of its workplace construction and the way these places of work ought to work sooner or later.
Tactical vs. strategic
You may also differentiate Apple’s method from the others as tactical vs. strategic. The Apple method is tactical, as a result of it addresses the issue of successfully managing distant staff by limiting them — which makes the issue simpler to take care of. However the variety of staff at Apple now saying they might bounce ship, particularly because it’s so public, suggests Apple can pay a strategic price for this transfer when it comes to misplaced staff and the associated hit to productiveness.
The opposite tech corporations appear to acknowledge that working from house is a essential perk, given the huge disparity in the price of dwelling in areas the place these corporations reside. And so they’re taking the time to seek out new methods to mitigate any command-and-control, work/life stability, and relationship points that the distant mannequin is thought to have.
Firms like Dell ought to have much less worker churn, which ought to end in fewer staff changing into disgruntled and appearing out. However this additionally means managers will have to be retrained, and team-building and associated packages might want to evolve. The advantages of this effort will seemingly accrue over time versus being instant.
It is about greater than the underside line
Apple’s excessive valuation would counsel that its method to commoditizing staff, inserting them, considerably beneath the agency’s margin focus and want for management will ultimately backfire. Applications like these at Cisco, HP, and notably Dell, ought to enable for higher strategic execution over time — and extra stability — however could not enable any of them to cross Apple in valuation. (The corporate’s smartphone success isn’t mirrored in any of the opposite corporations, giving it an enormous increase.)
The hazard is that if corporations merely have a look at the financials, they could conclude that treating staff like commodities is a finest observe. That could possibly be disastrous and could be a mistake. The distinction in ways is extra seemingly tied to the distinctive nature of Apple’s success in a section the place the others don’t play.
Apple does pay nicely, and it's not unusual for workers to put pay forward of different elements. However cash doesn’t offset the ache of working in an uncaring surroundings, and it seems loads of Apple staff try to vote with their ft. Whether or not that’s sufficient to cease this productivity-reducing observe is but to be determined. However I understand how I would love it to finish, with an trade that realizes staff are its biggest asset and are handled accordingly.
Post a Comment